More
On That Insurance Article
Your
recent article (October 2992 Contractor Review)
entitled, “Time for Something Concrete,” was
blatantly misleading in its portrayal of EIFS manufacturers
and their impact on the current insurance crisis.
Not only was the article laced with unsubstantiated
allegations and speculation from unnamed contractors,
but it failed to allow manufacturers to offer their
perspective on the important issues raised in this
piece.
A. N. Wilson, a British author, once said, “If
you know somebody is going to be awfully annoyed
by something you write, that’s obviously very
satisfying, and if they howl with rage or cry, that’s
honey.” If Steven Ferry’s objective was
simply to provoke EIFS manufacturers, he hit the
bull’s eye. But, in doing so, he did a gross
disservice to the industry and to a well-respected
publication.
Among other things, Mr. Ferry failed to include a
perspective on what constitutes good construction
practices, and what it takes to ensure a moisture-free
building envelope. Thanks, in large measure, to the
efforts of EIFS manufacturers, the construction industry
is far more sensitized today to the fact that all
components of a building envelope-including roofing,
flashing, overhangs, gutters, water diverters and
windows-must work together to create a moisture-free
environment.
To suggest that the insurance crisis has been fueled
by greedy EIFS manufacturers hell-bent on selling
products to anyone in a pick-up truck is simply ludicrous.
EIMA manufacturers have long been in the forefront
of efforts to train and educate EIFS applicators
to meet the industry’s tough guidelines. Many
offer in-plant training sessions and produce videos
and other materials designed to help applicators
improve their skills. Moreover, all manufacturers
provide easy-to-follow instructions on how to install
EIFS correctly. The problem is that some applicators
simply choose to ignore the manufacturer’s
instructions.
EIFS manufacturers have also been generous in their
financial support of education and certification
programs offered by industry groups such as the Association
of the Wall and Ceiling Industries-International
and the EIFS Industry Members Association. In so
doing, the manufacturers have sought to make it more
difficult for unqualified, fly-by-night operators
to compete in an ever more sophisticated EIFS marketplace.
Finally, most EIFS manufacturers have walked the
extra mile to provide contractors with technical
support, in developing new EIFS standards, in communicating
with gatekeeper audiences and in helping shape the
new International Building Code.
It’s
regrettable that EIFS manufacturers weren’t
extended the courtesy of defending themselves and
the industry they represent. As a result, AWCI’s
Construction Dimensions missed a golden opportunity
to add much needed clarity to the difficult issues
surrounding the EIFS insurance crisis.
Stephan
E Klamke
Executive Director
EIFS Industry Members Association
Morrow GA
Since this series of articles was
originally to be about insurance and not a who’s-to-blame
scenario, I thought a brief statement would be
in order.
The insurance “fiasco” is indeed multifaceted, but it goes far
beyond the relatively small percentage of EIFS application problems. Contractor
general liability insurance premiums have risen substantially, and for some
plastering contractors, unobtainable, because of the fallout from the residential
market where poor construction practices among other trades, such as missing
flashing, caulking and substandard windows that permit water infiltration into
the wall cavity; a hardening of the insurance market for all construction contractors;
increased reserve losses for the WTC resulting in less capital for underwriting;
lack of government policy on terrorism insurance; loss of premium-driven investment
income received by insurers; the inability to evaluate the risk associated
with mold; and, inadequate underwriting guidelines-and that’s the
short list.
I also want to reiterate that the Contractor Review is just that: a contractor
review. Manufacturers, suppliers, distributors and others allied to the
industry are usually not interviewed for such articles because it is
meant to be a
forum for contractors to feel free to speak out. And they feel free to
say what’s
on their minds because they know they will remain anonymous. Obviously,
it’s
working-they’re being heard, and all those in the industry who
are affected by their comments and are listening to them are to be applauded. -LMP
Courtesy
of EIMA